ZnO is cheap, non-toxic, and easy to make nanoparticles of. In the QD regime, reactivity increases significantly.
I would like to present an investigation into ZnO QD suspensions as an efficient and environmentally-neutral photocatalyst of distributed pollutants.
Precursor solutions in EtOH:
M/g mol-1 | n/mmol | V/mL | m/g | C/mol L-1 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Zn(Ac)2·2H2O | 219.50 | 5.0 | 50 | 1.0975 | 0.10 |
LiOH·H2O | 41.96 | 7.0 | 50 | 0.2937 | 0.14 |
Spanhel and Anderson, JACS (1991). DOI: 10.1021/ja00008a004.
Meulenkamp, J Phys Chem B (1998). DOI: 10.1021/jp980730h
Jacobsson and Edvinsson, Inorg Chem (2011). DOI: 10.1021/ic201327n
t = 0
, and can then be monitored in-situ using UV/Vis spectrophotometry.Spanhel and Anderson, JACS (1991). DOI: 10.1021/ja00008a004.
Meulenkamp, J Phys Chem B (1998). DOI: 10.1021/jp980730h
Jacobsson and Edvinsson, Inorg Chem (2011). DOI: 10.1021/ic201327n
A few challenges encountered during synthesis
Previous work in our group showed that particle diameter can be calculated from the band gap using the empirical relation
\[ E_\text{g} = 3.30 + \frac{0.293}{d} + \frac{3.94}{d^2} \]
which can be re-arranged into
\[ d = \frac{2 \times 3.94}{-0.293 + \sqrt{0.293^2 - 4 \times 3.94 \times (3.30 - E_\text{g})}} \]
Jacobsson and Edvinsson, Inorg Chem (2011). DOI: 10.1021/ic201327n
Determine the band gap: Tauc analysis
Growing QDs: optical band gap vs time
Time/min | Particle diameter/nm |
---|---|
1 | 0 |
10 | 2 |
100 | 4 |
1000 | 6 |
10000 | 8 |
100000 | 10 |
As nanoparticles grow, reactants are consumed. Growth steadily slows down.
\[ d = 1.9998 \times \log(t) - 0.0232 \]
PC degradation occurs while the QDs are growing, meaning
Solar simulator: Xe arc lamp, AM1.5G filter. Distance from lamp determines Suns.
These experiments suggest that we can have the cake and eat it too:
ZnO QD suspension effectively photocatalyses degradation of MB
Self-degradation of MB under 1 Sun
Self-degradation of MB under 1 Sun
QD growth